1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna
4 posters
Page 1 of 1
1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna
Executive Order 15 is unconstitutional and stupid.
"0015 (Hanna): P. Matthew Schenk is hereby Head of the Moon Party. Ryan N. Dohn is hereby Head of the Sun Party. There may now be two highlanders"
Forcing people to be heads of parties, while himself being a member of only one of those parties, is clearly illegal, but the most heinous part of this order is its final statement. Two highlanders? This violates a law higher than the Constitution itself!
It goes against something Sean Connery said.
Why does President Hanna insist on violating the clear rules about how many highlanders there can be? (FYI: There can be only one). I am not sure. But we cannot allow this disrespect for the rule of law! In fact, if we had a criminal court, I would charge him there as well for crimes against immortality, but since we do not and cannot punish him the way he deserves (a severe beating, at the very least) I instead say we invalidate this order, and end his tyrannical creation of mandatory parties. They are an abomination that spits in the face of Sean Connery! And they will be CRUSHED!
"0015 (Hanna): P. Matthew Schenk is hereby Head of the Moon Party. Ryan N. Dohn is hereby Head of the Sun Party. There may now be two highlanders"
Forcing people to be heads of parties, while himself being a member of only one of those parties, is clearly illegal, but the most heinous part of this order is its final statement. Two highlanders? This violates a law higher than the Constitution itself!
It goes against something Sean Connery said.
Why does President Hanna insist on violating the clear rules about how many highlanders there can be? (FYI: There can be only one). I am not sure. But we cannot allow this disrespect for the rule of law! In fact, if we had a criminal court, I would charge him there as well for crimes against immortality, but since we do not and cannot punish him the way he deserves (a severe beating, at the very least) I instead say we invalidate this order, and end his tyrannical creation of mandatory parties. They are an abomination that spits in the face of Sean Connery! And they will be CRUSHED!
J-Mads- Posts : 1024
Join date : 2009-07-31
Age : 33
Location : Your mother's a whore
Re: 1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna
I second this motion.
dohnage18- Super Special Awesome Person!!!!
- Posts : 1036
Join date : 2009-06-05
Location : Suck it Trebek!
Re: 1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna
Damn it Wachob, I knew I shouldn't have taken your advice on what should go into my last executive order! We can settle this out of court. We shall maintain the party leaders
Re: 1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna
The Prez wrote: We can settle this out of court. We shall maintain the party leaders
That is for the court to decide, Connery-hater!!!
J-Mads- Posts : 1024
Join date : 2009-07-31
Age : 33
Location : Your mother's a whore
Re: 1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna
As Sean Connery is always right, the E.O. 15 is unconstitutional. As is well known, the elastic clause indicates the Sean Connery shall not be trifled with in this manner. In addition, the naming of party leaders is to be left up to the parties themselves, not through such shenanigans introduced by a third party entity. In addition, the parties need only to be answerable to their members, and their members need only comply if they freely choose to.
AgentW- Posts : 917
Join date : 2009-05-26
Location : Mandalore
Similar topics
» 1 USAGS 9: Wachob v. Epp
» 1 USAGS 10: Hanna v. Epp
» 1 USAGS 21: Hanna v. Epp
» 2 USAGS 1: Hanna v. Epp, et al.
» 1 USAGS 18: Epp v. Hanna
» 1 USAGS 10: Hanna v. Epp
» 1 USAGS 21: Hanna v. Epp
» 2 USAGS 1: Hanna v. Epp, et al.
» 1 USAGS 18: Epp v. Hanna
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|