Why Not? : Beta
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna

4 posters

Go down

1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna Empty 1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna

Post by J-Mads Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:35 pm

Executive Order 15 is unconstitutional and stupid.

"0015 (Hanna): P. Matthew Schenk is hereby Head of the Moon Party. Ryan N. Dohn is hereby Head of the Sun Party. There may now be two highlanders"

Forcing people to be heads of parties, while himself being a member of only one of those parties, is clearly illegal, but the most heinous part of this order is its final statement. Two highlanders? This violates a law higher than the Constitution itself!

It goes against something Sean Connery said.


1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna Sean04


Why does President Hanna insist on violating the clear rules about how many highlanders there can be? (FYI: There can be only one). I am not sure. But we cannot allow this disrespect for the rule of law! In fact, if we had a criminal court, I would charge him there as well for crimes against immortality, but since we do not and cannot punish him the way he deserves (a severe beating, at the very least) I instead say we invalidate this order, and end his tyrannical creation of mandatory parties. They are an abomination that spits in the face of Sean Connery! And they will be CRUSHED!

1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna Sconnery
J-Mads
J-Mads

Posts : 1024
Join date : 2009-07-31
Age : 33
Location : Your mother's a whore

Back to top Go down

1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna Empty Re: 1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna

Post by dohnage18 Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:39 pm

I second this motion.

dohnage18
Super Special Awesome Person!!!!
Super Special Awesome Person!!!!

Posts : 1036
Join date : 2009-06-05
Location : Suck it Trebek!

Back to top Go down

1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna Empty Re: 1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna

Post by The Prez Sun Nov 15, 2009 4:02 pm

Damn it Wachob, I knew I shouldn't have taken your advice on what should go into my last executive order! We can settle this out of court. We shall maintain the party leaders
The Prez
The Prez

Posts : 1818
Join date : 2009-06-17
Age : 33
Location : Pewaukee, Wisconsin or Champaign, Illinois

https://www.youtube.com/user/DamnCrappyProduction

Back to top Go down

1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna Empty Re: 1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna

Post by J-Mads Sun Nov 15, 2009 4:18 pm

The Prez wrote: We can settle this out of court. We shall maintain the party leaders

That is for the court to decide, Connery-hater!!!
J-Mads
J-Mads

Posts : 1024
Join date : 2009-07-31
Age : 33
Location : Your mother's a whore

Back to top Go down

1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna Empty Re: 1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna

Post by AgentW Sun Nov 15, 2009 4:32 pm

As Sean Connery is always right, the E.O. 15 is unconstitutional. As is well known, the elastic clause indicates the Sean Connery shall not be trifled with in this manner. In addition, the naming of party leaders is to be left up to the parties themselves, not through such shenanigans introduced by a third party entity. In addition, the parties need only to be answerable to their members, and their members need only comply if they freely choose to.
AgentW
AgentW

Posts : 917
Join date : 2009-05-26
Location : Mandalore

Back to top Go down

1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna Empty Re: 1 USAGS 14: Wachob v. Hanna

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum