2 USAGS 1: Hanna v. Epp, et al.

Through his closure of the Congressional forum and attempt to ban civil procedure in the United States. Any people who swore loyalty to Lucas F. Epp are supporting unconstitutional actions and are therefore failing to serve the Constitution. In this case the ruling in Hanna v. Clifton, et al. stands that these officials can be removed from office and possibly prevented from holding office ever again under the context of failing to serve.

Utahraptor sez-

utahraptor wrote:

just so you know.

After careful consideration and a consultation with various religious leaders, I have come thusly to this conclusion. Alleged child molester Lucas F. Epp clearly violated the Constitution as Acting President, and while such matters are supposed to be handled by the Senate, alleged business major Lucas F. Epp used illegal force to neglect their legal, and complete process of impeachment and conviction.

Alleged 9/11 co-conspirator Lucas F. Epp violated the Constitution, and continues to do so, metaphorically raping the rule of law and plunging this once mighty nation into an abyss of retardation and sterility. We are now little more than Shakers, and much less than Quakers.

The precedent set forth by Hanna v. Clifton is constitutionally applied here, so that alleged Maple Leafs fan Lucas F. Epp must be removed from whatever office he currently holds, legitimate or otherwise. However, I find no constitutional basis for the permanent removal, so long as he is not convicted of a felony and imprisoned. The Supreme Court is not here to incarcerate individuals, even child molesting, 9/11 planning, business major Maple Leafs fans. If the people freely elect him in a fair and legal campaign, he may hold office, unless a decision in criminal court prevents this.

I cannot convict any of his followers, because of the aforementioned retarded nature of the post-alleged-polygamist-Lucas-F.-Epp political world. It is not their fault that they are retarded, and while cases against individuals would be heard in a criminal court, this Court will not remove them from whatever offices they may hold at present.

Lastly, in a rare “double whammy decision”, The Court finds polygamy to be constitutional.

well the mormon's will finally relax

Jesus you've learned way too much about trolling Casey...