Why Not? : Beta
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW)

5 posters

Go down

CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW) Empty CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW)

Post by The Prez Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:20 pm

The next two justices who depart the court shall not be replaced, except in the case of the Chief Justice.

If by the Year 28 of the simulation the two seats have not been vacated the resignations will be forced


Last edited by The Prez on Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:11 pm; edited 3 times in total
The Prez
The Prez

Posts : 1818
Join date : 2009-06-17
Age : 33
Location : Pewaukee, Wisconsin or Champaign, Illinois

https://www.youtube.com/user/DamnCrappyProduction

Back to top Go down

CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW) Empty Re: CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW)

Post by AgentW Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:30 pm

Utahraptor wrote:yea if changed to year 27. roar.
AgentW
AgentW

Posts : 917
Join date : 2009-05-26
Location : Mandalore

Back to top Go down

CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW) Empty Re: CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW)

Post by The Prez Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:38 pm

Yay to the amendment. Amendment passes
The Prez
The Prez

Posts : 1818
Join date : 2009-06-17
Age : 33
Location : Pewaukee, Wisconsin or Champaign, Illinois

https://www.youtube.com/user/DamnCrappyProduction

Back to top Go down

CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW) Empty Re: CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW)

Post by McSnuggles Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:26 pm

yay
McSnuggles
McSnuggles
Admin
Admin

Posts : 1076
Join date : 2009-05-25
Location : Here

Back to top Go down

CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW) Empty Re: CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW)

Post by Beta Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:07 pm

Trenton Rogers

Beta

Posts : 52
Join date : 2009-11-05

Back to top Go down

CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW) Empty Re: CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW)

Post by J-Mads Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:13 pm

This bill is wrong. We cannot destroy two seats on the Court and fire Clifton and Sheldon from their positions for no decent reason.

No rationalization for this bill was ever provided, and as such I could not vote on it.

Can this be sued? It's a MASSIVE conflict of interest for all court members, and Casey as Solicitor General as well.
J-Mads
J-Mads

Posts : 1024
Join date : 2009-07-31
Age : 33
Location : Your mother's a whore

Back to top Go down

CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW) Empty Re: CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW)

Post by The Prez Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:16 pm

Actually, the 28th Amendment passed the power of Solicitor General to the Vice President of the United States.


Last edited by The Prez on Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:31 pm; edited 1 time in total
The Prez
The Prez

Posts : 1818
Join date : 2009-06-17
Age : 33
Location : Pewaukee, Wisconsin or Champaign, Illinois

https://www.youtube.com/user/DamnCrappyProduction

Back to top Go down

CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW) Empty Re: CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW)

Post by J-Mads Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:29 pm

Well still, the Chief Justice can simply not hear the case, but his conflict of interest makes that unfair. If it WAS heard, all 3 votes would be compromised by self interest.

By the way, since we have no lower Courts of appeals, shouldn't our Court have to hear ALL cases? The Supreme Court can only deny hearing a case because a ruling had already been made. To have court cases dismissed without a ruling in ether direction seems truly un-American.
J-Mads
J-Mads

Posts : 1024
Join date : 2009-07-31
Age : 33
Location : Your mother's a whore

Back to top Go down

CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW) Empty Re: CR3- Judiciary Act of Year 22; Hanna (LAW)

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum